Depleted Fisheries

Measures the extent to which fish stocks within a nation’s EEZ are overexploited or have collapsed due to excessive fishing and poor management practices. This indicator is crucial for assessing the sustainability of marine resources and the effectiveness of fisheries management within these zones, which extend up to 200 nautical miles from the coast and are under the country’s economic jurisdiction.

High levels of depletion in an EEZ suggest critical overfishing issues and the urgent need for improved regulatory measures and sustainable fishing practices. Effective management of these areas typically involves implementing stricter fishing quotas, enhancing monitoring and enforcement of fishing activities, and promoting the recovery of fish populations through science-based management plans. Addressing the depletion of fisheries is essential for conserving marine biodiversity and ensuring the long-term viability and productivity of these vital economic resources.

The higher the score, the better the country ranks for this parameter.

The table is sorted from the highest score to the lowest:

Rank Country Score Change
1
Kenya
81 None
2
Tonga
80 None
3
Guatemala
65 None
4
Haiti
63 None
5
Algeria
59 None
5
Vietnam
59 None
7
Micronesia
58 None
8
Mozambique
57 None
9
Dominican Republic
55 None
10
Marshall Islands
55 None
11
Bangladesh
52 None
12
Sri Lanka
52 None
13
Mexico
50 None
14
Vanuatu
44 None
15
Fiji
42 None
16
Jamaica
38 None
17
Guyana
35 None
18
Guinea-Bissau
35 None
19
India
31 None
19
Pakistan
31 None
21
Sierra Leone
30 None
22
Eritrea
29 None
23
Papua New Guinea
28 None
24
South Africa
27 None
25
Sudan
25 None
26
France
24 None
27
Honduras
23 None
28
Russia
23 None
29
Liberia
23 None
30
United Arab Emirates
20 None
31
Saudi Arabia
19 None
32
Tanzania
14 None
33
Suriname
10 None
34
Peru
8 None
35
Oman
7 None
36
Myanmar
4 None
37
Samoa
2 None
38
Brazil
2 None
39
Angola
0 None
39
Antigua and Barbuda
0 None
39
Argentina
0 None
39
Australia
0 None
39
Bahamas
0 None
39
Barbados
0 None
39
Cambodia
0 None
39
Canada
0 None
39
Cabo Verde
0 None
39
Chile
0 None
39
China
0 None
39
Colombia
0 None
39
Comoros
0 None
39
Costa Rica
0 None
39
Croatia
0 None
39
Cuba
0 None
39
Cyprus
0 None
39
Denmark
0 None
39
Ecuador
0 None
39
Egypt
0 None
39
El Salvador
0 None
39
Equatorial Guinea
0 None
39
Estonia
0 None
39
Finland
0 None
39
Gabon
0 None
39
Germany
0 None
39
Ghana
0 None
39
Greece
0 None
39
Guinea
0 None
39
Iceland
0 None
39
Indonesia
0 None
39
Iran
0 None
39
Ireland
0 None
39 Italy 0 None
39
Japan
0 None
39
Ivory Coast
0 None
39
Kiribati
0 None
39
Latvia
0 None
39
Madagascar
0 None
39
Malaysia
0 None
39
Maldives
0 None
39
Malta
0 None
39
Mauritania
0 None
39
Mauritius
0 None
39
Morocco
0 None
39
Namibia
0 None
39
Netherlands
0 None
39
New Zealand
0 None
39
Nicaragua
0 None
39
Norway
0 None
39
Panama
0 None
39
Philippines
0 None
39
Poland
0 None
39
Portugal
0 None
39
Sao Tome and Principe
0 None
39
Senegal
0 None
39
Seychelles
0 None
39
Solomon Islands
0 None
39
South Korea
0 None
39
Spain
0 None
39
Sweden
0 None
39
Taiwan
0 None
39
Thailand
0 None
39
Trinidad and Tobago
0 None
39
Tunisia
0 None
39
Turkey
0 None
39
Ukraine
0 None
39
United Kingdom
0 None
39
United States
0 None
39
Uruguay
0 None

Source and Calculation

Fish stock status of each country are sourced from Sea Around Us. The proportion of a country’s stocks that are collapsed (catches < 10% of peak and year is post-peak) or over-exploited (catches between 50% and 10% of peak and year is post-peak) is calculated. A minimum score is given to a country that has 50% or more of its stocks either collapsed or over-exploited.

*Different sources offer varying data, as datasets may be subject to changes due to recent updates and revisions.