Total Management Cost

Quantifies the cost of properly managing a country’s protected area network relative to its overall economic output. A higher score in this metric, indicating a lower proportion of a country’s gross national income required to manage its protected areas, reflects greater efficiency of conservation management. Costly protected areas are more likely to be “paper reserves”, protected in name but under-resourced to enforce policy and mitigate threats.

Investing resources into conservation indicates a significant commitment to environmental stewardship, signifying substantial investment in activities such as habitat restoration, pollution control, and biodiversity conservation. This investment is crucial for long-term ecological health and sustainability, which can also contribute to economic stability through tourism, improved agricultural practices, and disaster resilience. On the other hand inadequate funding for environmental management could potentially lead to degraded ecosystems and a loss of biodiversity, which could impose long-term costs on the economy and public well-being.

The higher the score, the better the country ranks for this parameter.

The table is sorted from the highest score to the lowest:

Rank Country Score Change
1
Bangladesh
100 N/A
2
Barbados
100 N/A
3
Burundi
100 N/A
4
Cape Verde
100 N/A
5
China
100 N/A
6
Colombia
100 N/A
7
Djibouti
100 N/A
8
India
100 N/A
9
Indonesia
100 N/A
10
Iran
100 N/A
11
Iraq
100 N/A
12
Japan
100 N/A
13
Lebanon
100 N/A
14
Mauritania
100 N/A
15
Mauritius
100 N/A
16
Myanmar
100 N/A
17
Paraguay
100 N/A
18
Rwanda
100 N/A
19
Singapore
100 N/A
20
Solomon Islands
100 N/A
21
South Korea
100 N/A
22
Sudan
100 N/A
23
Tonga
100 N/A
24
Turkey
100 N/A
25
Uganda
100 N/A
26
Uzbekistan
100 N/A
27
Vanuatu
100 N/A
28
Vietnam
100 N/A
29
Antigua and Barbuda
99 N/A
30
Argentina
99 N/A
31
Cameroon
99 N/A
32
Chile
99 N/A
33
Congo
99 N/A
34
Comoros
99 N/A
35
DR Congo
99 N/A
36
Denmark
99 N/A
37
Equatorial Guinea
99 N/A
38
Gambia
99 N/A
39
Guinea
99 N/A
40
Haiti
99 N/A
41
Hungary
99 N/A
42
Ivory Coast
99 N/A
43
Jamaica
99 N/A
44
Kazakhstan
99 N/A
45
Laos
99 N/A
46
Madagascar
99 N/A
47
Nigeria
99 N/A
48
Philippines
99 N/A
49
Qatar
99 N/A
50
Senegal
99 N/A
51
Serbia
99 N/A
52
Seychelles
99 N/A
53
Togo
99 N/A
54
Uruguay
99 N/A
55
Albania
98 N/A
56
Algeria
98 N/A
57
Angola
98 N/A
58
Armenia
98 N/A
59
Cambodia
98 N/A
60
Costa Rica
98 N/A
61
Czech republic
98 N/A
62
Dominican Republic
98 N/A
63
Gabon
98 N/A
64
Guinea-Bissau
98 N/A
65
Guyana
98 N/A
66
Iceland
98 N/A
67
Israel
98 N/A
68
Kyrgyztan
98 N/A
69
Malawi
98 N/A
70
Pakistan
98 N/A
71
Sri Lanka
98 N/A
72
Switzerland
98 N/A
73
Turkmenistan
98 N/A
74
Zimbabwe
98 N/A
75
Belgium
97 N/A
76
Benin
97 N/A
77
Burkina Faso
97 N/A
78
Fiji
97 N/A
79
Mali
97 N/A
80
Mongolia
97 N/A
81
North Macedonia
97 N/A
82
Malta
97 N/A
83
Mexico
97 N/A
84
Moldova
97 N/A
85
Netherlands
97 N/A
86
Norway
97 N/A
87
Sweden
97 N/A
88
Tanzania
97 N/A
89
Kenya
96 N/A
90
Russia
96 N/A
91
South Africa
96 N/A
92
Suriname
96 N/A
93
Trinidad and Tobago
96 N/A
94
Ukraine
96 N/A
95
United Arab Emirates
96 N/A
96
Chad
95 N/A
97
Ireland
95 N/A
98
Nepal
95 N/A
99
Papua New Guinea
95 N/A
100
Saint Lucia
95 N/A
101
United States
95 N/A
102
Bosnia and Herz.
94 N/A
103
Grenada
94 N/A
104
Niger
94 N/A
105
United Kingdom
94 N/A
106
Central Af. Rep.
93 N/A
107
Cuba
93 N/A
108
Egypt
93 N/A
109
Malaysia
93 N/A
110
Samoa
93 N/A
111
Afghanistan
92 N/A
112
Azerbaijan
92 N/A
113
Bahamas
92 N/A
114
Germany
92 N/A
115 Italy 92 N/A
116
Brunei
90 N/A
117
Eswatini
90 N/A
118
Honduras
90 N/A
119
Kuwait
90 N/A
120
France
89 N/A
121
Ghana
89 N/A
122
Guatemala
89 N/A
123
Luxembourg
89 N/A
124
Romania
89 N/A
125
Tunisia
89 N/A
126
Austria
88 N/A
127
El Salvador
88 N/A
128
Finland
88 N/A
129
Georgia
88 N/A
130
Sierra Leone
88 N/A
131
Jordan
87 N/A
132
Morocco
87 N/A
133
Poland
87 N/A
134
Portugal
87 N/A
135
Dominica
86 N/A
136
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
86 N/A
137
Saudi Arabia
86 N/A
138
Latvia
84 N/A
139
New Zealand
84 N/A
140
Brazil
83 N/A
141
Canada
83 N/A
142
Spain
83 N/A
143
Belarus
82 N/A
144
Lesotho
82 N/A
145
Lithuania
82 N/A
146
Peru
82 N/A
147
Estonia
81 N/A
148
Nicaragua
81 N/A
149
Cyprus
80 N/A
150
East Timor
80 N/A
151
Australia
79 N/A
152
Eritrea
79 N/A
153
Greece
78 N/A
154
Montenegro
77 N/A
155
Mozambique
77 N/A
156
Bhutan
76 N/A
157
Slovakia
75 N/A
158
Slovenia
75 N/A
159
Bolivia
74 N/A
160
Panama
70 N/A
161
Tajikistan
69 N/A
162
Venezuela
68 N/A
163
Bulgaria
66 N/A
164
Ecuador
64 N/A
165
Croatia
62 N/A
166
Botswana
56 N/A
167
Zambia
51 N/A
168
Oman
47 N/A
169
Liberia
45 N/A
170
Belize
39 N/A
171
Namibia
31 N/A

Source and Calculation

Protected Area shapefiles are sourced from the World Database on Protected Areas through Protected Planet. Latest values of each country’s gross national income and purchasing power parity are sourced from the World Bank Group. The management cost in USD per km protected area is calculated for each country using the Balmford-Moore equation, multiplied by each country’s total protected area and then divided by the country’s gross national income to calculate the proportion of gross national income required to manage each country’s protected area network. A minimum score is given to a country that needs to invest 3% or more of its gross national income to manage its protected areas. *Different sources offer varying data, as datasets may be subject to changes due to recent updates and revisions.