Ecological Representativeness of Terrestrial Protected Areas

Refers to the degree to which protected areas reflect the full range of ecosystems and habitats within a geographical region. This concept is vital for ensuring that conservation efforts are extensive and inclusive of the diverse biological and ecological components of the landscape. Effective representativeness within protected areas helps preserve a wide spectrum of species, genetic diversity, and ecosystem services, crucial for ecological stability and resilience against environmental changes.

To achieve a high representativeness score, conservation planners must strategically select and manage protected areas, to reflect the diversity of terrains, habitats, climatic conditions, and biodiversity hotspots in the country. This approach ensures that conservation measures are not biased toward certain landscapes or species, thus providing a more comprehensive safeguard against biodiversity loss. Furthermore, representativeness requires ongoing assessment and adaptation to account for new scientific insights and environmental shifts, ensuring that protected areas continue to cover the most crucial and representative habitats over time.

The higher the score, the better the country ranks for this parameter.

The table is sorted from the highest score to the lowest:

Rank Country Score Change
1
Angola
100 N/A
1
Bangladesh
100 N/A
1
Belize
100 N/A
1
Brazil
100 N/A
1
Brunei
100 N/A
1
Cambodia
100 N/A
1
Cameroon
100 N/A
1
Colombia
100 N/A
1
Costa Rica
100 N/A
1
Cuba
100 N/A
1
DR Congo
100 N/A
1
Dominican Republic
100 N/A
1
Ecuador
100 N/A
1
El Salvador
100 N/A
1
Equatorial Guinea
100 N/A
1
Gabon
100 N/A
1
Gambia
100 N/A
1
Ghana
100 N/A
1
Grenada
100 N/A
1
Guatemala
100 N/A
1
Guinea
100 N/A
1
Guinea-Bissau
100 N/A
1
Guyana
100 N/A
1
Haiti
100 N/A
1
Honduras
100 N/A
1
India
100 N/A
1
Indonesia
100 N/A
1
Ivory Coast
100 N/A
1
Jamaica
100 N/A
1
Kenya
100 N/A
1
Liberia
100 N/A
1
Madagascar
100 N/A
1
Malaysia
100 N/A
1
Mexico
100 N/A
1
Mozambique
100 N/A
1
Myanmar
100 N/A
1
Nicaragua
100 N/A
1
Nigeria
100 N/A
1
Pakistan
100 N/A
1
Panama
100 N/A
1
Papua New Guinea
100 N/A
1
Peru
100 N/A
1
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
100 N/A
1
Senegal
100 N/A
1
Sierra Leone
100 N/A
1
South Africa
100 N/A
1
Suriname
100 N/A
1
Thailand
100 N/A
1
Bahamas
100 N/A
1
Trinidad and Tobago
100 N/A
1
Tanzania
100 N/A
1
Venezuela
100 N/A
1
Vietnam
100 N/A
54
Australia
100 N/A
55
New Zealand
100 N/A
56
Bhutan
89 N/A
57
Dominica
80 N/A
58
Maldives
74 N/A
58
Sri Lanka
74 N/A
60
Saint Lucia
73 N/A
61
Namibia
69 N/A
62
Iceland
67 N/A
63
Norway
67 N/A
64
Lesotho
65 N/A
64
Philippines
65 N/A
64
Taiwan
65 N/A
67
Antigua and Barbuda
64 N/A
68
Mauritius
63 N/A
69
Switzerland
62 N/A
69
Vanuatu
62 N/A
71
Botswana
61 N/A
71
Comoros
61 N/A
73
Netherlands
60 N/A
74
Chile
60 N/A
75
Denmark
60 N/A
76
France
60 N/A
77
United Kingdom
59 N/A
78
Zambia
59 N/A
79
Eswatini
58 N/A
79
Ireland
58 N/A
79
Nepal
58 N/A
79
Portugal
58 N/A
83
Belgium
56 N/A
83
Spain
56 N/A
85
Bolivia
55 N/A
85
East Timor
55 N/A
85
Zimbabwe
55 N/A
88
Austria
54 N/A
88 Italy 54 N/A
88
Luxembourg
54 N/A
91
Sao Tome and Principe
53 N/A
92
Barbados
52 N/A
92
Cyprus
52 N/A
92
Germany
52 N/A
92
Singapore
52 N/A
96
Malawi
51 N/A
97
Bahrain
50 N/A
97
Oman
50 N/A
99
Albania
49 N/A
99
Montenegro
49 N/A
101
Croatia
47 N/A
101
Greece
47 N/A
101
Slovenia
47 N/A
104
Laos
46 N/A
104
Paraguay
46 N/A
104
Qatar
46 N/A
107
United Arab Emirates
46 N/A
108
Seychelles
45 N/A
109
Congo
44 N/A
110
Kuwait
42 N/A
110
Poland
42 N/A
112
Bosnia and Herz.
41 N/A
112
Lebanon
41 N/A
112
Malta
41 N/A
112
Rwanda
41 N/A
116
Solomon Islands
41 N/A
117
Benin
40 N/A
117
Hungary
40 N/A
117
Slovakia
40 N/A
121
Czech republic
39 N/A
121
Israel
39 N/A
121
Japan
39 N/A
121
Jordan
39 N/A
121
Uruguay
39 N/A
125
Ethiopia
38 N/A
125
Estonia
38 N/A
125
Micronesia
38 N/A
128
Serbia
38 N/A
129
Bulgaria
37 N/A
130
Cape Verde
37 N/A
130
Niger
37 N/A
130
Togo
37 N/A
132
United States
37 N/A
134
Burundi
36 N/A
134
Romania
36 N/A
134
Saudi Arabia
36 N/A
137
Argentina
35 N/A
137
Kiribati
35 N/A
137
Latvia
35 N/A
137
Morocco
35 N/A
141
Burkina Faso
34 N/A
141
Djibouti
34 N/A
141
Georgia
34 N/A
141
Lithuania
34 N/A
141
Marshall Islands
34 N/A
141
North Macedonia
34 N/A
141
Sweden
34 N/A
148
Uganda
33 N/A
149
Chad
32 N/A
150
South Korea
31 N/A
150
Uzbekistan
31 N/A
152
Egypt
30 N/A
152
Tajikistan
30 N/A
154
Azerbaijan
29 N/A
154
Samoa
29 N/A
154
Tunisia
29 N/A
157
Central Af. Rep.
28 N/A
157
Eritrea
28 N/A
157
Iraq
28 N/A
157
Turkmenistan
28 N/A
161
Belarus
27 N/A
161
Iran
27 N/A
161
Mali
27 N/A
164
Afghanistan
26 N/A
164
Kyrgyztan
26 N/A
166
Canada
25 N/A
167
Finland
25 N/A
167
Ukraine
25 N/A
169
Armenia
24 N/A
169
Sudan
24 N/A
171
Algeria
23 N/A
171
Moldova
23 N/A
173
Turkey
23 N/A
174
Russia
22 N/A
175
Mauritania
21 N/A
176
Kazakhstan
19 N/A
177
Mongolia
19 N/A
178
China
18 N/A
179
Tonga
15 N/A
180
Fiji
7 N/A

Source and Calculation

Representativeness scores are sourced from the latest version of the CSIRO Protected Area Representativeness and Connectedness (PARC) indices. Country-specific scores are calculated as weighted geometric means across each country’s terrestrial and freshwater habitats, using the methodology included in the dataset. A maximum score is awarded to a country that has achieved a score of 1.0, meaning its protected areas are fully representative of its ecological diversity.

*Different sources offer varying data, as datasets may be subject to changes due to recent updates and revisions.