Ecological Representativeness of Terrestrial Protected Areas

Refers to the degree to which protected areas reflect the full range of ecosystems and habitats within a geographical region. This concept is vital for ensuring that conservation efforts are extensive and inclusive of the diverse biological and ecological components of the landscape. Effective representativeness within protected areas helps preserve a wide spectrum of species, genetic diversity, and ecosystem services, crucial for ecological stability and resilience against environmental changes.

To achieve a high representativeness score, conservation planners must strategically select and manage protected areas, to reflect the diversity of terrains, habitats, climatic conditions, and biodiversity hotspots in the country. This approach ensures that conservation measures are not biased toward certain landscapes or species, thus providing a more comprehensive safeguard against biodiversity loss. Furthermore, representativeness requires ongoing assessment and adaptation to account for new scientific insights and environmental shifts, ensuring that protected areas continue to cover the most crucial and representative habitats over time.

The higher the score, the better the country ranks for this parameter.

The table is sorted from the highest score to the lowest:

Rank Country Score Change
1
Angola
100 None
1
Bangladesh
100 None
1
Belize
100 None
1
Brazil
100 None
1
Brunei
100 None
1
Cambodia
100 None
1
Cameroon
100 None
1
Colombia
100 None
1
Costa Rica
100 None
1
Cuba
100 None
1
DR Congo
100 None
1
Dominican Republic
100 None
1
Ecuador
100 None
1
El Salvador
100 None
1
Equatorial Guinea
100 None
1
Gabon
100 None
1
Gambia
100 None
1
Ghana
100 None
1
Grenada
100 None
1
Guatemala
100 None
1
Guinea
100 None
1
Guinea-Bissau
100 None
1
Guyana
100 None
1
Haiti
100 None
1
Honduras
100 None
1
India
100 None
1
Indonesia
100 None
1
Ivory Coast
100 None
1
Jamaica
100 None
1
Kenya
100 None
1
Liberia
100 None
1
Madagascar
100 None
1
Malaysia
100 None
1
Mexico
100 None
1
Mozambique
100 None
1
Myanmar
100 None
1
Nicaragua
100 None
1
Nigeria
100 None
1
Pakistan
100 None
1
Panama
100 None
1
Papua New Guinea
100 None
1
Peru
100 None
1
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
100 None
1
Senegal
100 None
1
Sierra Leone
100 None
1
South Africa
100 None
1
Suriname
100 None
1
Thailand
100 None
1
Bahamas
100 None
1
Trinidad and Tobago
100 None
1
Tanzania
100 None
1
Venezuela
100 None
1
Vietnam
100 None
54
Australia
100 None
55
New Zealand
100 None
56
Bhutan
89 None
57
Dominica
80 None
58
Maldives
74 None
58
Sri Lanka
74 None
60
Saint Lucia
73 None
61
Namibia
69 None
62
Iceland
67 None
63
Norway
67 None
64
Lesotho
65 None
64
Philippines
65 None
64
Taiwan
65 None
67
Antigua and Barbuda
64 None
68
Mauritius
63 None
69
Switzerland
62 None
69
Vanuatu
62 None
71
Botswana
61 None
71
Comoros
61 None
73
Netherlands
60 None
74
Chile
60 None
75
Denmark
60 None
76
France
60 None
77
United Kingdom
59 None
78
Zambia
59 None
79
Eswatini
58 None
79
Ireland
58 None
79
Nepal
58 None
79
Portugal
58 None
83
Belgium
56 None
83
Spain
56 None
85
Bolivia
55 None
85
East Timor
55 None
85
Zimbabwe
55 None
88
Austria
54 None
88 Italy 54 None
88
Luxembourg
54 None
91
Sao Tome and Principe
53 None
92
Barbados
52 None
92
Cyprus
52 None
92
Germany
52 None
92
Singapore
52 None
96
Malawi
51 None
97
Bahrain
50 None
97
Oman
50 None
99
Albania
49 None
99
Montenegro
49 None
101
Croatia
47 None
101
Greece
47 None
101
Slovenia
47 None
104
Laos
46 None
104
Paraguay
46 None
104
Qatar
46 None
107
United Arab Emirates
46 None
108
Seychelles
45 None
109
Congo
44 None
110
Kuwait
42 None
110
Poland
42 None
112
Bosnia and Herz.
41 None
112
Lebanon
41 None
112
Malta
41 None
112
Rwanda
41 None
116
Solomon Islands
41 None
117
Benin
40 None
117
Hungary
40 None
117
Slovakia
40 None
121
Czech republic
39 None
121
Israel
39 None
121
Japan
39 None
121
Jordan
39 None
121
Uruguay
39 None
125
Ethiopia
38 None
125
Estonia
38 None
125
Micronesia
38 None
128
Serbia
38 None
129
Bulgaria
37 None
130
Cape Verde
37 None
130
Niger
37 None
130
Togo
37 None
132
United States
37 None
134
Burundi
36 None
134
Romania
36 None
134
Saudi Arabia
36 None
137
Argentina
35 None
137
Kiribati
35 None
137
Latvia
35 None
137
Morocco
35 None
141
Burkina Faso
34 None
141
Djibouti
34 None
141
Georgia
34 None
141
Lithuania
34 None
141
Marshall Islands
34 None
141
North Macedonia
34 None
141
Sweden
34 None
148
Uganda
33 None
149
Chad
32 None
150
South Korea
31 None
150
Uzbekistan
31 None
152
Egypt
30 None
152
Tajikistan
30 None
154
Azerbaijan
29 None
154
Samoa
29 None
154
Tunisia
29 None
157
Central Af. Rep.
28 None
157
Eritrea
28 None
157
Iraq
28 None
157
Turkmenistan
28 None
161
Belarus
27 None
161
Iran
27 None
161
Mali
27 None
164
Afghanistan
26 None
164
Kyrgyztan
26 None
166
Canada
25 None
167
Finland
25 None
167
Ukraine
25 None
169
Armenia
24 None
169
Sudan
24 None
171
Algeria
23 None
171
Moldova
23 None
173
Turkey
23 None
174
Russia
22 None
175
Mauritania
21 None
176
Kazakhstan
19 None
177
Mongolia
19 None
178
China
18 None
179
Tonga
15 None
180
Fiji
7 None

Source and Calculation

Representativeness scores are sourced from the latest version of the CSIRO Protected Area Representativeness and Connectedness (PARC) indices. Country-specific scores are calculated as weighted geometric means across each country’s terrestrial and freshwater habitats, using the methodology included in the dataset. A maximum score is awarded to a country that has achieved a score of 1.0, meaning its protected areas are fully representative of its ecological diversity.

*Different sources offer varying data, as datasets may be subject to changes due to recent updates and revisions.